
LUXEMBOURG GFM Special Report Nov 2018 www.globalfundmedia.com | 7
OVERVIEW
Apex Fund Services (Ireland). He notes that
UK fund managers have had to ramp up their
contingency planning in response to Brexit
and as a result the volume of applications
that the CSSF has received has significantly
increased over the last few months “as
firms seek to finalise their Brexit plans and
put them into action – both managers who
have decided to totally Brexit-proof their
businesses by setting up EU hubs as well
as those entering into discussions with third
party ManCos in earnest”.
He is of the opinion that Luxembourg will
continue to grow as the jurisdiction of choice
for third party ManCos in Europe.
“Those who establish their own AIFM tend
to retain the risk management and portfolio
management functions in-house, but we
would help with all the transfer agency and
fund accounting services, AML services on
investors, as well as give them a depositary
solution. The central administrative function
and other non-core requirements such as
tax and regulatory reporting services are
increasingly outsourced by managers who
set up their own AIFMs,” comments Burke.
There will need to be a cooperation
agreement between the UK and the EU in
order for the portfolio management function
to be delegated back to the UK manager
in a post-Brexit environment because UK
fund managers will, in six months time, be
classified as third country managers.
The delegation model is already in use
now. An EU AIFM can delegate the portfolio
management function back to non-EU fund
managers, such as those in the US and Asia
Pacific and it appears to be working well
enough.
“We envisage that a similar arrangement
should be possible for UK managers wishing
to use an EU-based AIFM,” continues
Burke. “Brexit is placing more focus on that
delegation model but that is the proposition
and from an Apex perspective it means we
can offer clients that one-stop-shop solution
at the local Luxembourg level, across the
value chain.”
Sonja Maria Hilkhuijsen, Global Head of
Compliance and Data Protection at Apex
Fund Services, confirms that a number of
UK managers are opting to have their own
substance and relocating to Luxembourg.
“They aren’t waiting for the Brexit
outcome. Particularly UK AIFMs, they are
anticipating and scenario planning to ensure
they are able to meet EU regulations and
secure their distribution channels in EU.
Waiting for the final Brexit outcome would
put their entire marketing strategy at risk.”
“These larger managers are recruiting
local professionals in Luxembourg in order
to demonstrate local governance and
substance to the CSSF, particularly in light
of the latest CSSF Circular 18/698 which is
fundamental for regulatory approval,” says
Hilkhuijsen.
The rules under AIFMD say that if you
invest more than 85 per cent of an EU
feeder fund into a non-EU offshore fund you
will lose the passport rights. As such, fund
sponsors must set up a parallel onshore
fund that runs alongside the offshore fund,
if they wish to avail of the funds passport.
Some people in the marketplace still aren’t
aware of this.
“The very largest PE/RE fund managers
will likely have both offshore funds as well
as European funds. I think the perception
is starting to change in terms of managers
thinking about Luxembourg to establish
funds as opposed to just thinking about
offshore jurisdictions such as the Cayman
Islands,” opines Joelle Hauser, Partner,
Clifford Chance (Luxembourg) and head of
its Investment Funds Division.
Hilkhuijsen points out that one of the
attractions to UK managers appointing third
party AIFMs in Luxembourg is that there
are no linguistic concerns, as one might
encounter when choosing Frankfurt, for
example, or Paris. “Luxembourg is very
multi-cultural, English is spoken among
professionals throughout its funds industry,
and it is well connected, making it easy to
travel to a number of different European
cities. It is Europe’s financial hub,” she says.
One point to stress for those managers
who are thinking of setting up their own
AIFM is that there is much closer scrutiny by
the CSSF in terms of substance. This should
be viewed as a positive, according to Fuchs,
and should not be feared.
“The Luxembourg Government, the CSSF
and professional associations have always
been proactive to develop new regulation.
In other jurisdictions, when regulation is
introduced it generates fear but Luxembourg